Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Software' started by RND, Oct 18, 2006.
Whats the difference between the two formats and is there any advantage in using one over the other?
AAC (M4A) is commonly seen becuase it's the compressor iTunes uses.
Files in AAC are smaller at the same or better quality than MP3. Apple reckons 128kbps AAC is the equivilent of 164kbps MP3.
I've used both formats, I fit much more music on my iPod with AAC, and I can't hear the difference.
It's becomming more compatible now too, you can get AAC plugins for most players, and mobile phones are starting to support it too, certainly the modern Sony Erricsons can play AAC.
What about AAC versus WMA, there both 128kbps. I suppose WMA because just about every mp3 player supports it now. I however have an Ipod and use AAC- itunes converts any .wma files into mp3s or aacs (i forget which)
.flac all the way, tbh
Seriously though, .m4a is definitely nice. I'm no audiophile, but I can't fault the quality over a decent .mp3. It's just the support that it lacks! I've got a plugin for Winamp 2, but it's not perfect.