Show me your Super_Pi benchmarks

[neil.h]

You can download it from Here (ftp://pi.super-computing.org/windows/super_pi.zip) if you dont have it all ready.

Benchmark on 1M to keep benchmarks the same.


Here is my score of 38 seconds

http://img16.photobucket.com/albums/v48/neilrhambly/misc/sp.jpg

[Dunc]

who cares? seriously, this is one of the more ridiculous benchmarks i've seen in a while.

[neil.h]

who cares? seriously, this is one of the more ridiculous benchmarks i've seen in a while.


hey its a bit of fun :rolleyes: ....just cos you got a crap score and didnt wanna post, theres nothing to be ashamed of :p :p

as they say "its not what you got its how you use it" ;) :D

[Dunc]

yes, thats right, i admit it.

sheesh :rolleyes:

[[GPO]Solitaire]

1m 41s on my terrible system :)

you done the 32M version yet suppodidly it ends in a load of "0"'s and "1" making a geometric shape..... "Semi-pop culture reference"

[neil.h]

32M no i havent, just thought id post it for some fun...1M is quick

[LANcaster]

39 seconds, damn ;)

[neil.h]

what cpu/ram do you have :)

[Fuzz]

1m 04sec

On my laptop

[LANcaster]

Athlon 64 3000+ @2.01 GHz and 512 MB Crucial PC3200 DDR. I'm quite pleased to see that it's keeping up with a 3.4 Pentium :).

[neil.h]

Athlon 64 3000+ @2.01 GHz and 512 MB Crucial PC3200 DDR. I'm quite pleased to see that it's keeping up with a 3.4 Pentium :).



yeah pentium need to pull there fingers outta there rears, god dam AMDroids just keep getting back up off the floor :)

[Trojan]

50 seconds..I have no idea whats best..higher..or lower? cant be bothered trying to find out :p

[njg291075]

2m 30s on my Hellfire PC - sniff :(

[neil.h]

lower is better :)

[Maxamus]

38sec !!!!

[neil.h]

go on max you know you wanna push it some more...my machine is abit poorly at the moment its lost just over a 1000pts on 3dmark2001 :confused: and i o/c it to 4 gigs the other day and i got 43sec on superpi....wtf....it wasnt thermal throttling or anything.

i think i need to format my hdd to get everythiong running proper again.

[Maxamus]

You know what i dont even know why im o/cing it that much. All i do is surf, play movies, copy dvd's and d/l mp3z.

All of a sudden i've turned into a hardcore overclocker :(
I think 3510MHz out of a 2600c is damn good. I would like to take it to 3600mhz but i think i'll be pushing it. Im stable for 2 days so far at 3.5 so i guess im gonner keep it there.

All i need now is a 22" CRT monitor, 3 silentmaxx enclosures and some UV stuff and im done for 2yrs hopefully.
Ive spend over £3000 on computer stuff in the last 2 months alone :eek:
and the Julie isnt happy

[neil.h]

LOL me Julie is not happy

[Maxamus]

I tried to play it cool by sending her flowers to her work place 2 weeks ago but she saw right through it :eek:
Its our 7yr anniversary next month so i better pull out all the stops :rolleyes:

[neil.h]

fish n chips :p

[Maxamus]

I wish women were that easy :)
She opens my wage slips for me so i cant say im on a shoe string budget

[benktlottie]

I just ran Super Pi and did 1m in 35 seconds (3.4ghz running at 3.62ghz). When I had my prescott processor, even when overclocked to 3.8/3.9, best time achieved was 37 seconds. Seems, somehow, this extra 2m L3 cache on my extreme helps.

[kin242]

41 Seconds on my Athlon 3500. Interesting App (i'm a mathematician)

Pentiums should be better than AMDs for this kind of thing I think.

[brumster]

Vapo-Li manages a moderate 31s.... :) shame it can't break the 30....

[cool_dude]

http://img11.exs.cx/img11/1337/SUPERPI_SCORES.jpg

Amd 3200 Winchester @ 2.4Ghz :cool:

[ViperVenoM]

think when mine was overclocked to 2.6ghz i had 32..or was it 34, ill have to hunt down that screeny..its was defo 32 or 34 tho

[cool_dude]

re-overclock it then ;)

and post a pic :D

[ViperVenoM]

meh i could...although ive found its not really aiding me in gaming and thats all i do so im not too bothered really

i know ive got a pic somewhere..i got over a TB of storage to sift through gimme chance :p

[Firefighter_UK]

41 secs (P4 3.2, 1 gig 3200 Golden Dragon)... "sob!!!... I hate not winning" :p

http://mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk/gordyswebgallery/score.gif

[cool_dude]

Brumster Seems to be in 1st place :D

/off topic\
quite a few people from london have been joining these forums latley :D
/off topic\

[brumster]

Brumster Seems to be in 1st place :D



As with all these things, I'm sure someone will soon come along and smash it ;)

[Cable Monkey]

Another at 38 seconds for an unclocked 3.4EE (478).

[ken]

Another at 38 seconds for an unclocked 3.4EE (478).

My XP-M at 2.6Ghz scored 39 sec...wat clock you r at m8?

[bouncin]

35 seconds at 2.4ghz timings are uber important on this test my ocz will only do 3,2,2,8 at 240ht would love to get my mushkin back in and lower the time down to 34 again.

u can also shave a second of 34+ scores by making the test high priority ;)

[cool_dude]

http://img11.exs.cx/img11/1337/SUPERPI_SCORES.jpg

Amd 3200 Winchester @ 2.4Ghz :cool:


New Timing i have :D :cool:
http://img26.exs.cx/img26/5697/q5bsuperpispeed.jpg

[Clarkey]

i just tested my intel celeron 900mhz internet pc i was 000h 04m 06s beat that lol :rolleyes:

[six5tring]

ohhh... i'll have to try it on my 486 :D - six

[jayos]

Heres my attempt ;)

http://www.jaypix.co.uk/gallery/pics/SuperPi%201M.jpg

[brumster]

/me hands over the crown ;) :D

[Ninjagordy]

hi lads.......

looks like mines a good one!...heh....pentium-m all the way! :cool:

super pi 1mb : 26 secs

[brumster]

Nice one ;) I suspected a Pentium-M would come along and do well at some point.

[Ninjagordy]

what gets me is the fact its over cloked by 1.3ghz and is sitting idle at 29 deg and never goes above 33deg at 1.585 vcore......

wonder how far a 2.13 will go on water!

cheers lads!


gordy! :D

[PHILIP1193]

im lost on who has crown?? just saw the 29 sec super pi lol ncie score mate!!

here is mine @ 34 seconds - tbh the only way u know whose is valid is by doing what i did as any 1 can photoshop the score it aint hard is it now?

FROM NOW ON PEOPEL SHOWING SCREENY'S PLEASE SHOW IT WHEN ITS COMPLETED ITS CYCLE SHOWING "PI CALCULATION DONE"

http://photobucket.com/albums/v364/PHILIP1193/?action=view&current=superpi1mb.jpg

Phil

[Ninjagordy]

it was 26 secs not 29...lol!

ill let you off this time, trying to get my hands on a 2.13ghz chip to see how far it will go!

regards

gordy! (may get down to nearly 20 secs!) :eek:

[bazzaa]

34s hear :(

[bazzaa]

got down to 33 sec at 3.9ghz

[Ninjagordy]

:D :D hi lads....looks like shigs will get the crown........

i sold him my 730!........

not to worry i have another that does 2.9ghz....lol

gordy! :D :D

[cool_dude]

pentium m's just do well at super pi'ing....

33 secs here, need 2 tighten timings on ram...

[jellybeard999]

why arent we using the new decimal version ???

im in the low 30s iirc ...

and how does the "calculation done" showing on screenies stop photoshopping ?

[THE BEAST]

+ 000h 00m 47s [1m]

Standard 3.0ghz P4 HT

[pumpman]

I wasnt aware but I was reading there are programmes which put a slow motion on your clock and it appears if you got a better score than you actually did

here is super pi with an anti cheat mod attatched as seen on extreme systems ive just copied and pasted http://superpi.radeonx.com/

[kempez815]

I get 30seconds Super PI.

This is at 2.8GHz with RAM @ 9/10 ratio and also @ 2.75 with RAM @ 1:1

Here's a pic:

http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y289/kempez815/27501to1.jpg

And CPU-Z validaion of 2.75 GHz:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=24636

And the one of 2.8GHz:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=22942

[fatnickc]

Sorry, but my superfast system blows all of you out of the water.
Yes, that's right, my 333mhz Pentium II managed an amazing 9 minutes 9 seconds. Still, that's alot faster than the 35 minutes outlined in the help section (albeit on a 90mhz Pentium).

[Herminator]

Just been playing with my 3700 SanDiego and trying to figure out the RAM settings in BIOS. Finaly got the ram running at the correct FSB, with a mild overclock for the cpu.

Result is 35sec.

I could probably get it lower if I could keep the memory in the 200-225 FSB range and get the cpu up a bit higher.

[intenso]

I'll have to verify this, but mine churns out the 1Mb test in approx 35 secs. although it could be closer to 31 sec....


i'll do it when i've fixed my raptor issue.

quick roundup of spex:
2 x 37gb raptors 10000rpm
asus a8n sli deluxe mobo
2 x 512 twinx 4400c25pt @ 275mhz ish
winxp pro
thermaltake modstream 520w
amd 64 winchester 3200 @ 2600mhz

[intenso]

ill try on my laptop

(acer travelmate 3202xmi) with pentium 725 M 1.6 on it when i get back !"

nick

[derthballs]

28 sec - 64bit 3.2 p4 @ 4.1ghz.

[DaGuv]

I'll have it down to 26sec, give me a while lol.

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/883/pi22ga.jpg

[intenso]

wow very fast

i got my system up and running again, 34 seconds. Thats with maximal memory bandwidth mind, at 287 FSB. gonna try and few more settings with the memory lower to go for cpu clock only :)

[Stigggeh]

go on then,... another sub 27 seconds with my P4-m


sorry about poo pic. this is with a poorly mounted Zalman 7000 (48c load :eek: )

this is on a 'officially unsupported' P4c800 (non e) deluxe. (Vdroop and Vcore modded) .. which has always been a put of a lemon.

got another board hoping to push it further,.... the solder iron is already warming :D

my ocz rev2 wont quite hit 280 :( so no 1:1 for me

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/michael.winward/P-Msuperpi.JPG

[kempez815]

Gotta love how those P4 M's kick ass at Super Pi :D

[cool_dude]

http://img309.imageshack.us/img309/8862/gangster30sepuk0gg.jpg

:) Cool_Dude :)

[goodall]

minute 30 on my god-aweful system

[bootup05]

34s on my Sandy @ 2.86

EDIT: ooops, lol :rolleyes: didnt see the last post date, sorry mods :p

[DarkEntity]

38 Seconds on my HP Laptop :D

[Lomax]

A disappointing 40secs on my standard 3500+ with 1gb Corsair XL @2-2-2-5. Might try and give it a bit of an overclock but I only have an SN25P so I won't hold my breath.

[Forthy]

37 seconds, on 'Beast' in sig.

That's on vista Beta2, so I'd like to think I could shave a little off that if it wasn't de-bugging in the background. *crosses fingers*

[DarkEntity]

Its still a decent score on a beta version of an OS.

[Stephen B]

fingers crossed I shall receive my 6600E early next week, rest of machine all waiting

target is 15 secs

[Carbine]

Mine:

Set-up below.

This is with the 6600 overclocked to 3.4Ghz @ 1.4v

http://img226.imageshack.us/img226/9926/minevh4.jpg

Will try 3.6 later on in the day.

[eomer]

mine is very similar @ 14.859 sec for 1m , but only air cooled! But it is a Zalman CNPS9500-LED cooler!! :cool:
http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/4421/screendumpxn5.png

[BigBen]

I hope to do better :)

[Fireblade]

I had the strangest feeling you wouldn't be too long in posting yer results in this thread :p

[BigBen]

I had the strangest feeling you wouldn't be too long in posting yer results in this thread :p

:D I aim to please m8 :p .. You notice I did not mention all the grief I had getting the thing up and running with those faulty Asus motherboards :rolleyes:

Regards

[SoapSud]

I get 21 Seconds on my pretty much stock speed e6600.

Money permiting, i'll get a bigger case next year so a better mobo can be bought too, unless someone can show me where a decent mATX board is that will support LGA 775 Core 2 Duo, and is a good performer, for a reasonable price.

[Toxcity]

38 secs here!

Not bad I suppose!

[Herminator]

21 seconds dead for my e6300 overclocked to 2.8Ghz.
Thats with a download running and a few usual bits and bobs.
I finaly got around to updating my BIOS and trying an overclock, almost 1GHz more without any problem, gotta love these cheap chips ;)

[Herminator]

19.047 now, overclocked to 3GHz, could try higher but this seems a nice point to let it run at :)

[bootup05]

Remember to change your sig then ;)

What cooling you got on that chip btw? :)

[Herminator]

Cooling is a nice and cheap Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro, which is keeping it idling at 41-43c, I really need to get the cores under load to see how high they go.
I wish 3DS max wasn't being stupid at the moment, then I could see how well it renders now :(

edit: Re-ran it just to check and it nipped under 19s, now it's 18.985, so pretty much a 19s average. Not bad for a £120 cpu and £130 worth of 2gig ram (which is now selling around £200 :eek: )

edit2: I can overclock to 3.15GHz and get 18.1s for Super Pi but it Prime95 crashes early on, I think I'll just knock it back a bit and leave it. It's still incredibly fast for a cheap chip.

[S.K.]

45 seconds, but.. it only used 50% of my processing power, it went 2% 13% 28%, 45%, 51% and kinda stoped there. Whats up with that?

[baillie]

45 seconds on my Toshiba Equium M50-216, PM1.7Ghz, 512Mb ram.

Will try it on my SN25P later on.

[fatnickc]

45 seconds, but.. it only used 50% of my processing power, it went 2% 13% 28%, 45%, 51% and kinda stoped there. Whats up with that?
You could try setting its priority in Task Manager to High.

[S.K.]

I did, perhaps its something to do with the dual core processor?

[LSG501]

super pi only measures one core, there is no smp version that I know of. So a benchmark of a really fast single core will beat a dual core with a slower speed but 2 cores (which total a faster cpu).

[BigBen]

Tried 266x15

[dabblet®]

Sweet result BigBen - I get 16ms (http://www.dabblet.net/nb/ss001.jpg) which isn't too bad considering the difference in overclock (http://www.dabblet.net/nb/ss002.jpg) :D

[Carbine]

14.957s on my overclocked e6600

[kempez815]

13.67 secs on my E6600 @ 3.6GHz

[bootup05]

15.973 Seconds on my E6400 @ 3.64GHz:)

EDIT: Hmm, seems a bit slow, might try tweaking the OS a bit, see If I can get anything out of it, Looks like if I want any higher, Im going to have to get some new ram, (Divider/POST issue's, Multiple Bios's tryed) Asus still working on it:(

[Stephen B]

<16 secs e4300 @3.6 gig

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/1003/bugsy39/e4300.jpg

[neil.h]

Dont forget Screenies please

[neil.h]

Only 2hrs Orthos stable on stock cooling but she'll superpi till the cows come home:cool:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/neilrhambly/untitled-5.jpg

Once I get some decent cooling I will be able to push it more

[Carbine]

New PI Scores from meh!

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/356/overclock3800qd9.th.jpg (http://img20.imageshack.us/my.php?image=overclock3800qd9.jpg)

CPUZ Verified: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=169432

[neil.h]

Nice one Carbine :)

[Stephen B]

yes good score, but man look at your vdimm !!! :)

[Carbine]

yes good score, but man look at your vdimm !!! :)

Yah i know! My system will only be stable at 3.8Ghz if i have >1.6v running through the bugger... though i have posted before @ 4Ghz - 1.67v but that was silly as it kept crashing.

I still need to tweak it a bit more and tighten the ram timings as i've seen people get sub 11-12s @ 3.8

I'm willing to push up to 1.7v if i have to as temps are very low:

Ambient: <15c
idle @ stock: 16c
Load: 25c

idle @ 3.6Ghz/1.525v: 21c
Load:36c

idle @ 3.8Ghz/1.6v: 28c
Load: Mid 40s

I'll start worrying if it hits 70c

[neil.h]

http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/1180/36fs2.th.jpg (http://img120.imageshack.us/my.php?image=36fs2.jpg)

[marcus000]

20seconds here on a C2D E6300!!! :-D
http://i179.photobucket.com/albums/w292/marcus000/Pi.jpg

[eomer]

13.697sec on E6850@3.810GHZ on VISTA!

can't wait for E8500!!

[eomer]

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j45/eomer888/outdoors/POWERPC/superpi.jpg
13.681sec on VISTA 64bit SP1

[Ninjagordy]

well lads heres my effort with 2 downloads going and a shed load of other things in the back ground......

[eomer]

http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j45/eomer888/outdoors/POWERPC/superpiE850039GHz.jpg

then faster @ 12.046sec (VISTA 64 SP1)

[TheFallenAngel]

13.203 seconds.

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/5176/13203snu6.th.jpg (http://img20.imageshack.us/my.php?image=13203snu6.jpg)

[eomer]

12.012
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j45/eomer888/outdoors/POWERPC/superpiE8500392GHz.jpg

[eomer]

Sub 12sec! Air cooled, only 1.4v, on vista!
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j45/eomer888/outdoors/POWERPC/superpiE85004GHz.jpg

[FlyingHaggis]

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/303/pinn1.jpg

Really wish this board would let me overclock.

[eomer]

with the E8500 on this motherboard It is just cruising @4GHz, I reckon with air cooling it should touch 4.2GHz by keeping 1.45V max.

now 11.638sec on vista64bit
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j45/eomer888/SUPERPI.jpg

[eomer]

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/303/pinn1.jpg

Really wish this board would let me overclock.


thw Q6600 should easily hit 3.6GHz with a half decent mobo.

[FlyingHaggis]

thw Q6600 should easily hit 3.6GHz with a half decent mobo.

Probably should, yeah. OC'ed it to 2.7 on a 300MHz FSB and 1.3v VCore. I'm a bit of a newb at OCing. I know the general workabout, but at the moment I can't tell if it's my lack of understanding of voltages, or just the motherboard that's letting me down.

Shaved 2s off my posteed time with this OC though.

[[GPO]Solitaire]

here's my pitiful attempt :D
http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a233/s0litaire/Screenshot.png

[_stu_]

Upgrading from my 2180 @ 3.3GHz to a q9550 (still at stock), knocked almost 6 seconds off my 1M. I know this chips a good clocker, so will be interesting to see how far it will go on the P5E.

[[GPO]Solitaire]

Oooooh! tempted to get a dual Quad core Mac with 32Gb Ram and see what speed I get :D:D

But don't have £3k+ to spend.. :(:( lol!

[_stu_]

Dropped it down to <14 secs with a slight nudge up on the FSB. Playing around with the ram now to see how far that will go. Next step is to get round to watercooling, but thats probably a few weeks of yet. Still using the Stock Intel cooler that comes with the 9650s. Which tbh for a stock HSF aint too bad, as long as you like blue.

[Affro]

10 seconds on 512k and 24 on 1M on my work laptop, i'll get my Small form factor to do it tonight and post up the results.

[Rambi]

8 seconds for the 512k and 20 for the 1m

[Affro]

On the desktop; 7 seconds for 512k, 17 for 1M

I'm not even sure if thats good?

[_stu_]

Its not bad at all tbh. Its pretty much a test of pure maths speed, so the higher the clock the better (newer chips always fair better, so the 45nm stuff will be slightly quicker clock for clock).

Stu

[Leoncc]

http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/1135/66861990rg9.png